I think that the savanna would be the best climate zone for a civilization to thrive because they would have plenty of animals and they would survive easily. They would need to be on the river, or "Bye, Bye, civilization". Mediterranean could also be good because the land is fertile for farming.
I agree with you Sean, because we would have plenty of food to live off of, but we would also have to be careful with the animals there as well. The Mediterranean would also be a good place to live.
I agree with you Sean because civilization must have a river in close proximaty or it will not end well. The savanna has the 4 major rivers in Africa so from the stand point, the Savana would be the best choice.
I agree with you Sean because it would be easier to live there because you could live near a river. if you lived in a desert you wouldn't have some of the resources to live.
I agree with you Sean . Because you are right that place dose have more animals than any place and weather to grow plants and drink water.
I agree Sean that the Savanna would be the best climate zone to live in because of its plentiful amount of animals . They would also need a river nearby to expand trade and to have a fresh supply of water.
I think the Savanna would be the best climate zone for a civilization to thrive, because we would have a lot of food to eat there. We would also be able to get water from a river or lake. I also think that the Rain Forest would be a good place to thrive in, but we would just have to be careful with the animals there.
I agree with you Armone. The only thing that I do not agree with is living in the Rain Forest. I do not think that living in there would be good, because you can not farm.
Yea i say the savanna is great bcz more water and animals ''food''.And the weather in savanna isnt that bad it seems bad at times but its not that hot neither cold there i think its the right choice to be there
I agree with you because people need food to live and it's nice to have good weather. I would diffidently pick the savanna also.
I agree with everyone on te Savana being the best climate zone in terms of survival. At first I was contemplating the rainforest because of the high amount of foliage, than I relizwd that would actually hurt a civilization. Because of the high rate of vegetation, agriculture and farming can't be produced. The savanna is definitely the best choice.
I would say a savanna because the savanna is not too hot or too cold, plus it has plenty of animals which means plenty of food. The more food humans have the better we can live. If I had a choice I would never pick the rain forest because it has low vegitation along with the deserts.I would not like the Medditeranian either because of the rainy winters. So I would love the savanna mostly because of the high life stock.
I say living in the Savanna would be the best choice. I say this because there is lots of food and water there. It is also not to dry like to desert.
I agree with you. The Savannah is the best place to live. Like you said, there is lots of food and water. Also, a free that the desert is most likely not a good place because it is dry.
I agree with you Etta. A place where it is hot and dry wouldn't be a very good place to have a civilization because probably there isn't a lot of water.
I think that the Mediterranean would be the best for a civilization to thrive. I think this because the Mediterranean has very fertile land which would be great for agriculture. Also the Mediterranean has a very rainy winter so that they can get a lot of water and feed their crops.
I agree with you, Jenna. Mediterranean is good because crops can grow, but in the savanna, there is lots of gold, animals, and rivers to live off of, too.
I think that the Savannah is the best place for civilization because, it has lots of animals.Plus, the ground is fertile for crops. Also, the climate is mainly mild, perfect for crops and animals.
I definitely agree that is what I was saying. Lots of animas fresh water and crops to grow on the water. It is the perfect biome to thrive in.
I think the savana would. that is because that is near all of tne animals.the animals are there because that is where the water is.
I agree with you about the animals. Although I agree, I think that the temperature would be extremely warm.
The Mediterranean zone would be the best because it has a mild climate. Personally, I like the mix of temperature and precipitation we get in Northern Illinois (the font makes the i took like an L). Although it would be hotter than Illinois it would be better than living at the equator.
I think that the Sahara would be the best place to have a civilization because it's easy to survive in.
I would think the savannah because it has everything. It has animals (meat) and water! To top that they can grow the crops there because of the fresh source of water. It is just the perfect biome to thrive in.
I say the savanna would be the best place. I don't think it was hard to get food since it was so many animals. Also you can grow lots of crops and get water and make wooden stuff with all the trees around but there's not a lot. And the rain forest can be good because lots of rain to grow crops and high trees high base.
I I think the savanna would be the best climate zone to thrive in.This is because it has a good source of water. Also where there is water most likely there will be animals.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.