I believe that they were both great. Ghengis Khan united the nomadic Mongol tribes. Ghengis taught his soldiers to show know mercy on enemies. Yet Kublia Khan did lead the Mongol empire even bigger, following on with his sons. I think Ghengis Khan was better of the 2.
I agree with you Tyler. Genghis Khan did many great things like unite different Mongol tribes. He also taught his soldiers to be strong in battle and show no fear or mercy like you said towards enemies.
I agree with you Tyler B because Ghengis Khan did make the empier bigger also he was really rich. That´s why I agree with you
Tyler I agree both where great leaders. And ghengis was the better of the two but if kublia make a even bigger empire woudn't he the better one.
I think it would be smarter to have Ghengis Khan to be ruler. I think it would be smart because he took over a lot of land. He also made people fear his crew so he could dominate other towns and villages.
Ghengis Khan was a ruler Julian. But I don't think he was good because of conquering land. His son, Kublai Khan, and many sons and grandsons etc, went on to conquer even MORE land. He was good at training his army to be good with horses, and show no mercy.
He also was good with uniting Mongol tribes.
I totally agree with you Julian. Genghis Khan was a very vicious ruler, and he easily destroyed and conquered many villages. The only down side to that would be that he was very like bloodthirsty, and vicious. Not to mention... disgusting.
It would be a pretty close race, but in my opinion, Genghis Khan was a better ruler than Kublai Khan. Reason being, Genghis Khan was the one who united the mongols. If they were never united, they never could have been a Chinese Dynasty, and Kublai Khan would never have been an emperor. Also Genghis Khan conquered the Song dynasty and when he did this, he took control of all of China. Don't get me wrong, Kublai Khan was a great ruler, but I think Genghis Khan was just a little better.
I agree because Genghis Khan lead the mongols to more land. He also started a great empire too.
I agree with you Cooper he had conquered all of china not just a little piece of it. He united the mongols who invented stirrups which would have changed the way the world would be today with horse back riding.
I agree with you Cooper. Genghis khan did unite the mongols without him that dynasty would not have happened.
I agree with you. Genghis Khan because he made these regular men into stog powerful soilders. scince he had a powerful army other towns or villiages woul now they were coming and surrender right away.
I agree with you Cooper. He just did more that benefited the empire, such as a stronger and more reliable army.
I think Kublia Khan was a good ruler, but I think that Genghis Khan was a better one. For example he conquered many lands. He also united the mongols into a fierce army. He also would let the people worship any religion they wanted if he had conquered them.
I agree with you because he DID reunite the Mongols and shaped them into a great army. and thats how the conquered all that land.Leaving nothing but ruins.
I agree with you Logan, Kublia was a good ruler but Ghengis was the first. He was able to turn several tribes into a great army.
I think Ghengis Khan was a better ruler because he brought all of the mongol tribes together to make them a fighting team. He conquered most of the land that the mongols took over. He had to be a great ruler to be able to take over Chinas huge population for the time. Another obstacle he faced was the great wall, it would be VERY hard to get passed a wall of that length and that height. It would also be VERY hard to govern a place that big after you just took it over because a lot of citizens wouldn't like you. In my opinion Kublia Khan wouldn't have been able to do as much as his dad, I thing Ghengis Khan paved the path for Kublia Khan.
I think Ghengis Khan was the better ruler. I think that because he taught his soilders to to make people fear them which means if other towns heard of them that would surrender right away and not have to fight them. Ghengis Khan also took over alot of land so the can make the empire bigger and make bigger army with the surviors from places the defeted.
I agree with you Kyla I think Genghis Khan was a good ruler. He did make people fear him so he could conquer land easier. He also did have the survivors from the defeated lands join his army to make the army bigger.
I think Ghengis Khan is the better emperor. I believe he was better because he had his army take over a bunch of land. His army even conquered as much land as Rome in 25 years, when it took Rome 400 years. Even though he was very brutal I still think he was a good ruler, at least for his time. But I think he was brutal because he had a very difficult childhood and even his wife kidnapped and it carried over to his adulthood. But this why I the Ghengis Khan was a very good ruler.
I agree with you Logan M. Genghis Khan was also the best in my opinion. I like how you talked about him conquering the same land as Rome in 375 years less.
I agree with you Logan M because he was a better ruler overall. I didn't even think about how he had conquered more land then the romans ever did in 375 less years.
I think Genghis Khan was the better ruler because he taught the soldiers to have No mercy on anybody.I fell that is really helped the mongols dominate central china. Even though I don't really like Genghis Khan as a person because in my opinion he did a lot of harsh things to people and he liked seeing people cry because his army killed their loved ones.
I agree with Taniya M. because he did like to see people cry and that is the only thing I don't like about him
I think that it would be Genghis Khan because he had much land.
He battled many people of many villages. And he kept battling.
I think the better ruler would be Ghengis Khan bnecause he went to other city cities and gave them free goods just so if they went to war with them they no how powerful they are. Also to see that they have great goods so we can trade with them.Another reason I think Ghangis Khan is a better ruler because he had big ships that were so grade and really had great plans. He pushed his slaves or people hard, They invented a lot of things such as gun powder. That is why I think Ghangis Khan was a better ruler.
I think It would be Ghengis Khan because he took over all the land he could and to the people in need with him. He was more friends with the poor and helped then agenst evil people. He would make them surrender and take some as his servants. He does sound like a evil ruler but he was just trying to get by.He helped those in need and was a good ruler. He treated hi solders well and infected the bad people with hi sickly solders since he could not do anything for them.Well this is my opinion.
I agree with you Deniyah. I think Ghengis Khan was a better leader than Kublai Khan because he protected the poor from enemies unlike Kublai Khan,who had very little mercy.
I believe Genghis Khan was the better ruler overall. He conquered many lands, which made his rule even more significant. He also let the religions slide. This helped by having no rebellion. They feel like nothing changed other than having to pay taxes.
I think the better ruler is Ghengis kahn .He got so much land. Also he had a big army.
I think Ghengis Khan had the biggest impact. He was the first one and set most of the rules, how they lived, and started them off by conquering a lot of land. He never surrenders and always kept fighting. His son Kublai Khan continued his rein but Ghengis Khan started it all.
I agree Logan, I also think Genghis Khan Did a good job. We also had a same reason, "Genghis Khan started the dynasty". Another one was, "he conquered a lot of land".
I belive Genghis khan was the better leader. he built a great army system. and almost took over all of asia but was fragmented by his death.
I think Ghengis Khan was the greatest of the Mongol rulers. He was the first emperor. His empire became the largest of his time after his death.
I think ghengis khan was the better leader. He established a great army system. He built a vast empire but was fragmented by his death . And almost took over all asia .
Ghengis Khan is who I think did better because he started the dynasty. Without him Kublai Kahn wouldn't have done so well. Also he conquered more area than Rome in 40 years. That's why I think he didi so well.
I think Ghengis khan was a better ruler. He lead a strong army. I also do not like him because he liked to see people im pain.
I think Genghis Khan was a better leader than his son. He unified Mongolia and conquered most of Asia by the time of his death.
I think Genghis Khan was a better leader. Because he brought all the mongols together without him the mongols would not have strived. Genghis Khan ruled all the land he conquered which is difficult because it was so big.
I think Ghengis Khan is a better ruler because he was more merciful to the poor. Also, he reunited the Mongols. He also, conquered(with his army) more land than than did in 25 years.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.