I think Genghis Khan is better. This is because he conquered a lot of land. By the time he died they had conquered more land than Rome and Greece put together.
That is a great point Erica, that he did conquer a lot of land. Greece and Rome was small compared to the Mongolian Empire.
I think your correct Erica .He did Genghis Khan conquer lots of land than Rome or Greece did.
I think Kublai Khan was a better emperor, because he treated people better than his father, Genghis Khan. Also, at least he conquered some land instead of none. And Genghis Khan did very bad things to people and killed thousands.
I see your point, Armone. Genghis Khan did conquer more land than Kublai Khan, though. Genghis Khan did do horrible things, but he still conquered tons of land.
I support and add on to Sean's point. Kublai Khan was a total softy and lost most of the empire to rebells.
Yeah I agree with you armone because Kublai Khan treated people more fairly.And although Ghengis Khan treated people bad but at the end of the day he is the reason why Mongolia has the most land
I agree with you Armone because he was fair unlike Genghis.
I agree with you Armone. Even though he did not conquer more land than Genghis, the people liked him better than his father. I think that the people liking you is more important than conquering more land with more people that don't like you.
Yea I agree with you armone because he Unite all his people and they conquered China.
But without Genghis Khan they would have rebelled way earlier. Nobody would be scared of him. The torture was what held the empire together.
I think Genghis Khan was better than Kublai Khan in terms of their accomplishments. Genghis had one thousand kids. It's an accomplishment, but maybe not a good one. Although Kublai was much kinder to people, Genghis conquered much more land with his fear tactics.
I agree with you because Kublai had a lot of accomplishments and was not as hard. Although 10% of people in the world are related to Genghis. So it is even in my thoughts.
I agree with you Sean because yeah he did have a thousand kids! but like you said he conquered more land, more land than Rome and Greece put together!
I agree with you but Kublai khan made mor improvementsin the land he conquerd
And that's why I think Ghengis Khan was better.
I think that Genghis Khan is better because he gained all the land in the mongol empire. His only mistake was giving it to Kublai Khan. This guy not only lost most of it but he was a softy. Unlike Genghis he was very merciful and gentle with his attacks. Genghis Khan is certainly better.
I think that Kublai Khan was a better emperor because he was fair and was kind to the citizens so they respected Kublai. Although Genghis conquered lots more land, Genghis was very cruel and treated people badly.
I disagree with you, Josh, because Genghis Khan may have been harsh, but he got a lot more accomplished. Genghis also reunited the whole empire and if he didn do that, Kublai wouldn´t have an empire to rule.
I think Gengis Khan was a much better ruler in terms of accomplishments becuase he united a whole empire. Before he showed up, there was no such thing as the Mogal empire; only a bunch of nomads. He also got a lot of things done that helped people, even if it was a little harsh.
I agree Amy that Gengis Khan was a much better ruler because of how he managed to bring an empire together and conquer a LOT of land also.
I think that Kublai Khan was better than Genghis Khan. Kublai Khan was better liked by the people and treated them better than his grandfather. Even though Genghis conquered more land, I think that being liked by people is better than having lots of land filled with people that don't like you.
I agree with you Etta. The more land= more people= more money.
I think Genghis khan was better than Kublai Khan, because he did conquer more land.He conquer more land than Rome and Greece put together! That's really big! He also conquered more land in a shorter amount of time.
I think Genghis Khan was better because he conquered a ton of land. he conquered more land in 88 years than the whole roman empire did. He did a lot of conquering in the time he lived.
I think kublai khan because when he united all the people in Concord China. He also conquered many lands without fighting them. He also didn't really need to have an army around his territory because nobody really wanted come to where they are.
I see your point, Kublai was a less harsh ruler. BUT the only reason that he conquered lands without fighting, is because Ghengis created such a reputation, that no one wanted to fight them. So, Ghengis khan is a better conquerer.
I think that that Ghengis Khan was better. I think so because, he was the one who united all of the Mongols. Which would take a lot of courage, mainly because he would of had to deal with 100s of people. Plus, some of those people would not want Ghengis as leader.
I sorta agree, he did reunite the Mongols but Kublai advanced the war system.
I say that kublai khan was better. I think this because he concerd more land in 1280 than Genghis khan did in 1227. Also when Kublai khan was ruling him and the mongols and him made improvements in the lands he conquered. they improved rods and water travel.
I think Genghis Khan was better emperor than the other emperor. He is the one conquered more land than Rome in a shorter amount of time and his empire is still bigger. So I think he is the best.
I would have to say the Kublai Khan was better. They were both strong and many accomplishments but Kublai had more. He made larger and stronger equipment for battle.
I think that Gengis Khan was a much better ruler by actually starting the empire. Kublai Khan just fell in the footsteps of his grandfather but Gengis Khan was the one who started it all. He was the one who brought the Mongolian empire together and conquered most of it's land while being the leader.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.