3-4 Sentence Response
2-3 Sentence Relpy
Which emperor do you think was better; Genghis Khan or Kublai Khan? Why
3-4 Sentence Response 2-3 Sentence Relpy
33 Comments
Erica P.
2/15/2016 06:23:47 pm
I think Genghis Khan is better. This is because he conquered a lot of land. By the time he died they had conquered more land than Rome and Greece put together.
Reply
Armone L.
2/17/2016 11:45:10 am
That is a great point Erica, that he did conquer a lot of land. Greece and Rome was small compared to the Mongolian Empire.
Reply
Triston .p
2/21/2016 02:24:34 pm
I think your correct Erica .He did Genghis Khan conquer lots of land than Rome or Greece did.
Reply
Armone L.
2/17/2016 11:43:02 am
I think Kublai Khan was a better emperor, because he treated people better than his father, Genghis Khan. Also, at least he conquered some land instead of none. And Genghis Khan did very bad things to people and killed thousands.
Reply
Sean Z.
2/17/2016 02:59:33 pm
I see your point, Armone. Genghis Khan did conquer more land than Kublai Khan, though. Genghis Khan did do horrible things, but he still conquered tons of land.
Reply
Brandon P.
2/17/2016 05:19:47 pm
I support and add on to Sean's point. Kublai Khan was a total softy and lost most of the empire to rebells.
Kevon s
2/17/2016 04:32:44 pm
Yeah I agree with you armone because Kublai Khan treated people more fairly.And although Ghengis Khan treated people bad but at the end of the day he is the reason why Mongolia has the most land
Reply
Josh W.
2/18/2016 05:57:16 pm
I agree with you Armone because he was fair unlike Genghis.
Reply
Etta S
2/19/2016 09:42:20 am
I agree with you Armone. Even though he did not conquer more land than Genghis, the people liked him better than his father. I think that the people liking you is more important than conquering more land with more people that don't like you.
Reply
JadaJ
2/19/2016 02:51:45 pm
Yea I agree with you armone because he Unite all his people and they conquered China.
Reply
Mark P.
2/22/2016 03:03:18 am
But without Genghis Khan they would have rebelled way earlier. Nobody would be scared of him. The torture was what held the empire together.
Reply
Sean Z.
2/17/2016 02:56:12 pm
I think Genghis Khan was better than Kublai Khan in terms of their accomplishments. Genghis had one thousand kids. It's an accomplishment, but maybe not a good one. Although Kublai was much kinder to people, Genghis conquered much more land with his fear tactics.
Reply
Anthony L
2/19/2016 09:43:16 am
I agree with you because Kublai had a lot of accomplishments and was not as hard. Although 10% of people in the world are related to Genghis. So it is even in my thoughts.
Reply
Lilli J.
2/19/2016 09:50:11 am
I agree with you Sean because yeah he did have a thousand kids! but like you said he conquered more land, more land than Rome and Greece put together!
Reply
william k
2/20/2016 04:03:17 pm
I agree with you but Kublai khan made mor improvementsin the land he conquerd
Reply
Kevon s
2/17/2016 04:34:06 pm
And that's why I think Ghengis Khan was better.
Reply
Brandon P.
2/18/2016 03:05:27 pm
I think that Genghis Khan is better because he gained all the land in the mongol empire. His only mistake was giving it to Kublai Khan. This guy not only lost most of it but he was a softy. Unlike Genghis he was very merciful and gentle with his attacks. Genghis Khan is certainly better.
Reply
Josh W.
2/18/2016 05:50:12 pm
I think that Kublai Khan was a better emperor because he was fair and was kind to the citizens so they respected Kublai. Although Genghis conquered lots more land, Genghis was very cruel and treated people badly.
Reply
Amy G.
2/19/2016 09:44:05 am
I disagree with you, Josh, because Genghis Khan may have been harsh, but he got a lot more accomplished. Genghis also reunited the whole empire and if he didn do that, Kublai wouldn´t have an empire to rule.
Reply
Amy G.
2/19/2016 09:45:51 am
I think Gengis Khan was a much better ruler in terms of accomplishments becuase he united a whole empire. Before he showed up, there was no such thing as the Mogal empire; only a bunch of nomads. He also got a lot of things done that helped people, even if it was a little harsh.
Reply
Noemi R
2/21/2016 07:50:13 pm
I agree Amy that Gengis Khan was a much better ruler because of how he managed to bring an empire together and conquer a LOT of land also.
Reply
Etta S
2/19/2016 09:47:16 am
I think that Kublai Khan was better than Genghis Khan. Kublai Khan was better liked by the people and treated them better than his grandfather. Even though Genghis conquered more land, I think that being liked by people is better than having lots of land filled with people that don't like you.
Reply
Erica P.
2/19/2016 09:50:52 am
I agree with you Etta. The more land= more people= more money.
Reply
Lilli J.
2/19/2016 09:47:25 am
I think Genghis khan was better than Kublai Khan, because he did conquer more land.He conquer more land than Rome and Greece put together! That's really big! He also conquered more land in a shorter amount of time.
Reply
Mark P.
2/19/2016 09:52:11 am
I think Genghis Khan was better because he conquered a ton of land. he conquered more land in 88 years than the whole roman empire did. He did a lot of conquering in the time he lived.
Reply
JadaJ
2/19/2016 02:55:15 pm
I think kublai khan because when he united all the people in Concord China. He also conquered many lands without fighting them. He also didn't really need to have an army around his territory because nobody really wanted come to where they are.
Reply
Alex .M
2/20/2016 10:43:08 am
I see your point, Kublai was a less harsh ruler. BUT the only reason that he conquered lands without fighting, is because Ghengis created such a reputation, that no one wanted to fight them. So, Ghengis khan is a better conquerer.
Reply
Alex .M
2/20/2016 10:38:46 am
I think that that Ghengis Khan was better. I think so because, he was the one who united all of the Mongols. Which would take a lot of courage, mainly because he would of had to deal with 100s of people. Plus, some of those people would not want Ghengis as leader.
Reply
Erik.N
2/21/2016 06:18:08 pm
I sorta agree, he did reunite the Mongols but Kublai advanced the war system.
Reply
william k
2/20/2016 03:57:39 pm
I say that kublai khan was better. I think this because he concerd more land in 1280 than Genghis khan did in 1227. Also when Kublai khan was ruling him and the mongols and him made improvements in the lands he conquered. they improved rods and water travel.
Reply
Triston. P
2/21/2016 02:31:18 pm
I think Genghis Khan was better emperor than the other emperor. He is the one conquered more land than Rome in a shorter amount of time and his empire is still bigger. So I think he is the best.
Reply
Erik.N
2/21/2016 06:15:16 pm
I would have to say the Kublai Khan was better. They were both strong and many accomplishments but Kublai had more. He made larger and stronger equipment for battle.
Reply
Noemi R
2/21/2016 07:53:14 pm
I think that Gengis Khan was a much better ruler by actually starting the empire. Kublai Khan just fell in the footsteps of his grandfather but Gengis Khan was the one who started it all. He was the one who brought the Mongolian empire together and conquered most of it's land while being the leader.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2017
Categories |