I think the Western part of Rome fell because it was getting to big and they didn't have enough soldiers on the border. Also because they didn't have enough soldiers many invaders got in. Rome didn't do anything about it and the invaders were just staying in Rome's land. Another reason why is because too many people were getting a plague and they had to raise taxes.
yeah Torrance I totally agree with you. Allthogh all of rome didn't have that any solders on the borde but still good job.
i agree with brett and torrance if that had more soliders nobody would've got in.More money would help with more soliders
i totally agree with you. your first sentence expands every thing. i think you hit the spot.
I agree, the western half was just to big. If they had more soldiers I think that the western half of Rome wouldn't have fell. Also I never thought that the invaders staying on Romes land could've been a reason the western half fell, that's a good point
I agree with you. The Western part of Rome was too big. If it was smaller, they may have not fallen.
I agree with you Torrance because invaders would just find unguarded areas to enter the Western half of Rome. They would also be fine on Rome's land because they had no guards inside of the Western half of Rome. They also got the plague which killed many people.
I agree with you that the Western part of Rome fell because it did not have a strong soldiers and invaders were to powerful for them and the taxes were to high for most of the people who lived there
In my opinion the largest reason it fell is because they did not have that strong /big of an army. if they had a larger and a stronger one they could of defended them selfs.
Brett I don't really agree with you. I think they have a large enough army it is just that they didn't use their army correctly.
Yes but no. Their army was not big, yes. However, the army was a reason but money affected the army and everything else. If they had money the army would be big and nothing else would be affected.
i think the western half of Rome fell because it was not well prepared in my opinion. it was not strong enough to do all its responsibility. it did not have a strong army and they did not have enough solders either. Another reason western Rome fell is because they did in plan vary well.
I think the western half of Rome fell because it was too big. Rome's army was not big enough to keep invaders of the land, they didn't even have enough soldiers to guard the borders. That's another reason the western half probably fell, because they had no one to guard the borders, invaders easily got in. Overall the western half was just too big to guard.
I agree with you because the army was too small and Rome was too big. they could of squished Rome together and everything would have been better.
I agree with you Rylee because the western half was just too big. You are right that the invaders got in because they didn't have enough soldiers to cover the borders.
I think that the Western part of Rome fell because it was not guarded well at all! They positioned their army only on the border. So if someone gets through then they have free rain in they rest of Rome.
I agree Collin. It wasn't really the best decision to only station the arm at the orders.
I think the western part of Rome fell because of how the army was pot around the borders. So if a part of the army left there station someone could get in Rome easily. So if there was a second layer it would be harder to get in Rome.
I agree with you Ethan because if there was one layer it would be kind of easy to get throw with no one there it would be very easy if there were two layers It would be very hard for the bad people to get throw.
I think the western part of Rome fell because it was way too big. If the land was smaller, they could have kept control over the land in a better way.
I agree with Matt because if the rich and the pore went to just Rome and had a army they could of survived all the attacks or could of gotten away
I think that it fell because it was just too large and the Eastern part had better resources. This obviously says the the west was basically failing from the start. The other half got the money and the army.
I agree with you Sela.If the western side had more of there soldiers then western Rome might not have fallen.
I think the main reason the Western half of Rome fell was because it was too large. Their army could not control all of the land. Then, invaders would get inside of Rome and be fine because they had no army to guard the inside of Rome. Finally, the invaders would attack Rome and successfully take it down.
wait! there was one over break!
I think the biggest reason the western half of Rome fell was because of.. money. Without money you can't have strong weapons to defend yourself. The reason money affected weaponry was because the could not pay blacksmiths a lot of money cocluding from this they quit.
I think the Western part of Rome fell because it was to big.Roman army was only on the outline of Rome so if invaders defeat the army they could just walk around in Rome.Another reason is that they let the Germanic warrior live in side Rome's northern border.
I agree because It was to big and the army was to small. So they can just roam around with no worries about being killed
k the biggest western part of Rome fell because it doesn't have a strong army and its enemies were stronger than them and have better weapons and the western part of Rome fell.
I think the western half fell because the army's were not big enough to guard the borders.So this means that the barbarians and other army's can take them out easily.This leads to the army's taking over and the western half falls
The western Empire fell because the eastern had the money.I think that empeor took money and the west couldnt pay for soliders.If the east and west were united the west would have had good money and could have survived.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.