(2-3 SENTENCES MIN)
(RESPOND TO AT LEAST ONE OTHER STUDENTS REACTION)
DO YOU THINK THE ROMAN REPUBLIC WOULD HAVE ENDED IF JULIUS CAESAR DID NOT EXIST?
(2-3 SENTENCES MIN) (RESPOND TO AT LEAST ONE OTHER STUDENTS REACTION)
46 Comments
Brett M.
11/20/2015 01:06:33 pm
no because ceaser gave plebs good things so they stayed. if he did not do that they would leave and rome would be armyless so they would get attacked and would die out
Reply
Tyler M.
11/20/2015 01:30:50 pm
I completely agree with you Brett because if the plebeians were not treated well they would have revolted.... AGAIN.
Reply
Brett M
11/20/2015 03:20:05 pm
Exsacaly
Sela V
11/21/2015 07:41:02 am
I agree with you completely. Rome would definitely have not survived if Caesar wasn't there
Reply
Hi
12/13/2016 01:59:10 pm
Hi
Matthew O
11/25/2015 10:15:51 am
I agree with you Brett, if the plebeians did not get those rights, they would have revolted.
Reply
Kailey S.
11/25/2015 07:52:06 pm
I agree with you Brett M. That the plebs would leave and Rome would not have an army and they would all die.
Reply
G
11/28/2015 07:01:06 pm
I agree with you completely. Rome would have ended because Rome would be armyless without plebs
Reply
Vivian F
11/28/2015 07:06:06 pm
G was me. I messed up on my name
Mr. Kaciuba
11/30/2015 07:33:30 am
I'm confused by what you are saying Brett, Tyler, and Sela.
Reply
Kunle Odumabo
12/1/2015 10:34:00 am
Brett your wright because the plebs wanted more rights and if would die out didn't they would have to leave Rome.Also then the Roman Empire would fall from being attacked.In this conclusion if Julius Seasar rome would have fallen
Reply
Kunle Odumabo [Kj]
12/1/2015 01:53:53 pm
What I mean is your brett Because the plebs wanted more rights in the goverment and thats what they got.Also the Romans wouldn't have lived if julius seasar wouldn't have them those rights.so in the end conclusion the roman empire wouldn't have went on without him.
Kennedi M.
1/4/2016 10:24:20 am
I agree because of the plebeians and if they were not treated well they would stop fighting
Reply
Tyler M.
11/20/2015 01:36:01 pm
No because the senate wouldn't kill anyone. If he didn't exist 3 different people would be leading instead of having an emperor afterwards. Julius Caesar did end the democracy because he announced to be ruler of Rome forever, and if he hadn't like I said 3 people/2 (cant remember) would be leading.
Reply
Brett m
11/20/2015 03:19:42 pm
totally agree with you tyler. I should put more detail in mine like yours
Reply
Sela V.
11/21/2015 07:38:24 am
Well no because of the fact that the Senate were very strict believers in the the Republic. I mean,they were upset enough when Caesar declared himself dictator for life, if he hadn't come along then there wouldn't be any reason to end the Republic. It would've been better if they had kept it at the Triumvirate where all three of them were equal in ruling. I think that Pompey and Crassus got so jealous that they basically convinced the senate that Julius Caesar wasn't being fair. So it was the only reason the republic ended.
Reply
Kelsey H.
11/21/2015 08:00:38 am
i think you are kind of right because the senate was pretty strict.
Reply
kj
12/1/2015 01:47:33 pm
Yes the senate was quite very strict But Julius Seazar wasn't if you ask me.
Brett M
11/21/2015 07:21:23 pm
I agree with you sela because would of been so much easier with the tri.
Reply
Torrance H.
11/22/2015 10:50:47 am
I agree with you 100% because it wouldn't have ended if their ruling was equal.
Reply
Rylee S.
11/28/2015 06:50:12 pm
I completely agree. If it would just have been equal there would be no reason to change anything. Nothing would have ended.
Reply
Kelsey H.
11/21/2015 07:57:10 am
9 think it would not end because Caesar was the one how said that he was dictator for life and that is what end the republic.So if he did not
Reply
Brisa C.
11/23/2015 05:31:56 pm
I agree with you because the only reason people were mad was because he declared that he was dictator for life. That's why he was stabbed.
Reply
Brett M
11/21/2015 07:22:53 pm
Yeah I never thought about it that way. I agree I just did not think that way
Reply
Torrance H.
11/22/2015 10:47:26 am
I don't think it would have ended because the only reason it ended was because Pompey and Crassus got too jealous. They could have handled it differently and the Republic wouldn't have ended.
Reply
Kennedi M.
11/23/2015 07:47:06 am
I don't agree because if Pompey and Crassus got jealous that would prob. start a war and end Rome
Reply
Kennedi M.
11/22/2015 05:52:36 pm
I think it would have ended because the publicans would think they still would not have power and no one was stiking up for them. Then they will go agents the patricians killing each other, then the population would get smaller. So Rome's enemies would kill that small population ending Rome
Reply
Logan.s
11/23/2015 03:24:22 pm
I agree because if it just kept getting smaller there would be no more of rome because the Olympians might want power and then it happen over and over again
Reply
Matthew M.
11/29/2015 03:05:29 pm
I agree with you because Julius gave the Plebleians more rights and power. If the Plebleians did not get more rights and power they would eventually die or try to fight against the Patricians. Then, Rome would have fallen apart.
Reply
Brisa C.
11/23/2015 05:28:06 pm
I do think that the Roman Republic would have ended because when Julius Caesar was stabbed, the republic fell shortly after. If he didn't exist the republic would of fallen shortly too because Rome wouldn't win many wars like Caesar did.
Reply
Matthew O
11/25/2015 10:10:33 am
I do not think that the republic would have ended. The republic still had a lot of power. They had strong solders and great generals that would lead them into battle. They could have found another great leader if Caesar did not exist.
Reply
Bryan Carlos
11/25/2015 07:58:56 pm
I agree because the Roman Republic was all ready strong with their solders trained. Also they were wealthy and wouldn't let no one have to much power. Thats why they made a republic.
Reply
Bryan Carlos
11/25/2015 07:50:41 pm
I do think that the Roman Republic wouldn't ended if Caesar didn't exist. Because the Republic was all ready strong. Also they wouldn't have to get mad at Caesar because he wouldn't have so many power. They just needed to focus harder.
Reply
1/24/2020 08:42:44 pm
Bryan, I am you from the future. It is January, 24 ,2020. And it's 10:34PM. I know what your thinking you are a sophomore. So why the hell are you here. Well that's a great question I am so so soooo bored that I decided to spend an hour trying to find the comment that you posted. But yeah that's basically it. High school is pretty great and you finally joined a sport. Nope its not soccer sadly. But it is XC, and track. Well I love the running so that's great. Also at the moment you have a girlfriend her name is Gianna. And she is amazing. But yeah that's pretty much it. Oh wait you have a new best friend it's not William anymore It's Colton. LOL. But Now your in honors classes so that's great. But I still don't know how I got in honors. The teachers must have been in drugs or something. But yeah that's crazy. Ok I think I should stop typing now. I might be back her next year or Senior year to say hey again. SO yeah bye. Also I had to sponsor Apple.lol.
Reply
Vivian F
11/28/2015 06:30:37 pm
I do think that the Roman republic would have ended because Julius Ceasar won the battle with Gaul. So then if Julius Ceasar didn't exist Gaul would have defeated Rome and Roman Republic would have ended
Reply
Collin M.
11/29/2015 08:22:07 am
I didn't think of that. But not only would the Republic end the whole of Rome would end too. I TOTALLY agree.
Reply
Rylee S.
11/28/2015 06:48:05 pm
No because if Julius Ceaser hadn't come and made people upset there would have been no problem. The senate wouldn't have killed anyone and no one would be jealous. If he had been a normal ruler there would have been no reason to end the republic.
Reply
Lena E
11/29/2015 04:56:58 pm
I agree with you Riley because if the Senate have not killed Ceaser the republic would not have ended.
Reply
Collin M.
11/29/2015 08:15:21 am
Yes, I believe that if there was no Julius then nothing would have ended the Roman Republic. But there could've been someone even worse after Julius. What I mean by this is that there would be no triumvirate so they would have to find another leader to join the triumvirate. This person might have changed the Republic totally! So we will never know if it would've survived that much longer even if Julius wasn't there.
Reply
Collin M.
11/29/2015 08:18:26 am
Yes and no I forgot to put that in. Sorry.
Reply
Matthew M.
11/29/2015 02:53:17 pm
I think the Roman Republic would of ended if Julius Caesar did not exist because he played a major role in the Roman Republic. Julius did things for the Plebleians that made their life better. If Julius did not exist the Plebleians would eventually leave Rome or try to fight the Patricians. If that would of happened Rome's Republic would have fallen apart.
Reply
Ethan C.
11/29/2015 05:16:40 pm
I agree with you, because Julius Caesar created jobs for everyone and limit slaves in Rome.
Reply
logan.s
11/29/2015 03:39:46 pm
I agree with you matt because I think the pleblians would get sick and tierd of being treat like garbage and would fight against the patricans and try to take over.
Reply
Lena E
11/29/2015 04:53:33 pm
No because if Julisus Ceaser hadn't come and upset all the people their would be no problem. So then if the Senate didn't kill Ceaser then the the republic would not have ended
Reply
Ethan C.
11/29/2015 04:57:27 pm
Yes,the Roman Republic would have fallen if Julius Caesar had not existed. Before Caesar came to power poverty grue because the slaves took the plebians jobs Caesar created jobs.
Reply
Kennedi M.
1/4/2016 10:14:25 am
No because he did do good things but not so much that it would have ended. What I am trying to say is that julius was a good ruler not a great one so that is why I say no
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2017
Categories |