I think they were more similar because they were both based on land and importance to society.
I agree that they were similar with them both based on land. Though the Emperor was not at the top like the kings. But still the majority of things were similar than different.
They were more similar than different. I believe this because they were both based of of the same concepts. They were based off of land and importance in society.
Yeah Wally I agree with you. Grace did not add that the Emperor was not that important in his role of power. He is what is called a puppet in a puppet government.
I agree with you Grace that they were more similar because they were based on land. They were only different from religion and the emperor.
The Feudal societies were much alike than they were different. They both had the main people with the most power at the top. Then they had the protectors and warriors, then the lower classes, then the peasants. So they were alike and not much different.
I agree with you that the two societies were similar. But there was also one other similarity. Both cultures had codes of honor for the protectors/warriors.
I think that Japanese and European feudal societies were very similar. Both were feudal (duh) and they had similar class systems. From powerful rulers with all the land down to workers with very little power or land. Both also had codes of honor for the warriors of that culture.
I definitely agree. Every class in both systems had the same role as their equivalent in the other system. Except with Japan they also had Artisans and Merchants, not just peasants.
In my opinion the Feudal societies of Japan and Europe were more alike than different. Even though they have different names like the Daimyo and lord or Emperor and King. They both also have to do with land and who owns it.
Peter, I agree with you in the sense that they were similar, but your reason is a bit foggy and incomplete. The reason they are similar is that they were based off of deeds to society and land owned. The different levels of equivalency.
Daimyo = lord/lady/ knight
Peasant/ merchant= Peasant
some people's feudal pyramids may be more accurate than mine but this is what I have seen.
I agree peter bacase the fedul society's were both similar because the lords are like the daiymo. I also think because the Kinights and the samuri had a similar code of honnor.
I'd say they were very similar. There were the land owners or Daimyo and Lords who did the same thing for both systems, there were the Samurai and Knights who both protected in turn for land, and there were the peasants who gave food to the land owners and soldiers in turn for land and protection.
I agree, with you Niko because they were similar. The warriors and knights were very similar just like the daimyos and lords. I agree with you, Niko, they are similar.
In my opinion, the feudal systems were very alike. This is because, they were based off of the same idea. The idea was based off of the idea of giving land and their responsibility in society. However, they were a little different because the Japanese feudal system was organized depending on how much you helped the society whereas, the European feudal system was organized based on how rich you were. Overall though, I believe that the feudal systems were more similar than different.
I think that the two feudal societies were more similar than different. I think this because they were almost the exact same order. The only difference was their religion and the emperor being in control or not.
In my opinion fuedal societies were more different. I thikn they were more different because the king had no power whatso ever.
I believe that the European and Japanese feudal societies were more similar. They both have a code of honor which is Bushido and Chivalry. The Knights or Samurai promised to serve and fight for their lord. Also, their placement was on how much land they own. If you owned a lot of land you would be a King/Queen or Shogun. If you had a little land you would be a peasant.
I agree with you Markita R. I say this because they both had code of knighthood. Also, the emperor has no power.
I think they are the same because they both are base on land and importance to society. but the way the japanese is ruled by a solier and the european is ruled by a king.
I disagree I think they are more different than alike because so many things about them are different from each other. Like there codes of honor and their religion and their art. And also when we read the article about the two it said they were more different than alike.
i agree they all wanted the most power.
I think their Feudal societies were similar because they both had the most important person then the warriors, then the lower class, then last they have the peasants. So from both they have the same type of Feudal Societies. The only differ were that they have differ type of people for the places in the feudal societies.
I think that Japanese and European feudal societies are more different than alike because they have different codes of honor. And the main religions are different. And their types of art are different.
This question is a question I had to think about. But I think that it is more similar than different. I say this because they where both based on the same thin, land.
I agree with Nathan. I agree because it has more similarities than differences.
There are definitely similarities and differences in each of the feudal societies but in my opinion they are more similar. They were both based on land and duty, both had warriors & lords, and both had a code of honor. One of the major differences is the role of the leader. And if you think the leader is important in this system, then maybe you might think these systems are more different than similar.
I agree with Dhwani. P, because like you said they both go by the same rules only a few type of things are a different's though overall they are mostly alike. Both helped their own society's and many things that both did that were the same and yes things were different in somethings though overall same wins by having more things in common.
I think that they were similar because the samuri and the knights had the exact same code of honner. The Nobles were also, the equivalent to the Daiymio which almost had more power than the king or emperor. I also think that they were diferent in one way because the King had a lot of power but the emperor had no power.
I really agree with you Jacob. Knights and samuri had the same code. Like one law from it, treet ladys nicely.
I think they were more similar.Because it was based on land.Also they liked the Kings .
I think that they re similar because they all were trying to have the most land and power
I think there more similar. I say this because they both have a code of knighthood. Also, the emperor has no power at all.
I really think that they were simailer. The king and emperor had the same power. OR what about knights and samurais? They were the same. Also the pendents and well, pendents were the same.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.