I think they were more similar. I think this because they both had deals. When I say deals I mean Shogun gave land to the samurai for protection and same thing with knights and kings.
Who thinks the Blackhawks can pull this off tonight?
I agree with you. I think they were more similar.
I agree with you because they are more similar to each other. They both had similar jobs and deals. The samurai or knight gave protection to the noble or daimyo. Then, the noble or daimyo would give the samurai or knight land. They also had the same jobs like the noble or daimyo were the land owners. The samurai or knight both protected their land. So, i agree with you that they are more similar.
I think they were more similar than different. I think this because of how knights and samurai protected the upper classes from invaders. They were the warriors in the feudal pyramid.
This was only one of the reasons to why they were similar. There are many other reasons also.
I completely agree with you Matthew. Do you remember what the Daimyo did.
I disagree with you Matthew O. I disagree because they are the same set up but just different names.
But thats exactly what he said. They are more similar because of that
hi guys how are you
I think it was more similar. I think it was more similar because they had the same set up but different names. Like when the shogun,king.
I agree with you. They were the same setup, but they had different names.
im lovin this school
Y R U doing this in Scool
More than this school?( ‾ʖ̫‾)
this school is better
I think they were more slimier. I mean they both have a feudalism systems. this is just my opinion.
YOU ALL ON
I think they are more similar than different. I think they are similar because they all had 1 ruler and a land ruler. Then there was a protector of the peasants.
I agree with you because they did have same kind of ruler. Also they both had land ruler and a protector of the peasants.
i agree with you. that basically that i put.
I think that they are more similar because the systems had the same power. The systems tended to be more similar because it seemed like they would've based it off each other.
I think they were more similar because it was basically the same. The people had the same jobs as each other. The samurai and knight both have to protect their people. The daimyo and the noble were both landowners. The samurai or knight would protect the noble or daimyo. Then, the daimyo or noble would give the samurai or knight land. So, these feudal systems are very similar to each other.
There are definitely similarities and differences in each of the feudal societies but in my opinion they are more similar. They were both based on land and duty, both had warriors & lords, and both had a code of honor. One of the major differences is the role of the leader. And if you think the leader is important in this system, then maybe you might think these systems are more different than similar.
I totally agree with you that they have similar and differences. Well a similarity is they have big land owners.
I agree there are similarities and differences. In my opinion they were more different though.
I totally agree with you that they do have differences and similarities.
i think that they were simulate.i think this because the large land ones
are protected by the wooers .
I think that they are more similar then different because, they have the top of the pyramid. Is the shogun and the kings and queens then are similar because they both ruler there empires. They both have some kind of land owners. Also, they have some kind of warriors.
I agree with you Lena. I didn't think of how the pyrimd was a little simliar.
I think they were more different. I think this because the pyramid was the only thing they had in common. When it came to religion and culture, they had absolutely nothing in common.
In my opinion I think the two rules were diffrent because the people were treated diffrently
what do you mean they were treated differently? can you explain more because I do not get what you are saying.
I think they were more simliar. For one reason knights and samurais both have a code in Europe, chivirly, and in japan they have bushido. Another simliarity was the knights and samurais both swear vows of loyalty to their lords.
I agree with you. I also think that they were more similar.
I think that they are more similar than different. The samurai and knights both had a code of honor. The feudal pyramid also said only one rules and both of the pyramids had someone that owned land.
I think that they are more similar. Because they both had a ruler for every land. Also they are similar because they had knights and samurais. That they both had a rule that they had to be brave and nice to the women's.
I think the pyramidsare both.I think that they are both similar and different in ways. Like have there top of the pyramid the rich and powerful and at the bottom is the poor and powerless like farmers peasants and civilians in the land.
different because there are more classes in the Japan's. They also different because during the middle ages they had kings and queens in Japan they do not have kings and queens.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.