The emperor because it is gust one person in charge and if there is more people involved than know one will agree on anything. Also I think that it will be to chaotic and more people will want to be in the region.
The Pope is one person kenned and so is the Emperor. The Emperor will be controlling everyone and no one will get to do what they want at the Christian Church.
I don't think having two people involved would be a bad thing. The emperor may know nothing about Christianity, and just want more power. The Pope knows about his religion and would be a better leader. There could be two leaders, they would just have to respect each other, and not let anymore people rule with them.
I think that the church should not have a leader at all. I think so because, if the church has any SINGULAR leader but instead, have more people work the churches. Like a council. Like Rome has shown us, if someone is given too much power, then some people will abuse it. So, if ther is 1 corrupt person, then it won't ruin the whole churc, as long as there's someone who is not curupt on said "council".
I Agree but disagree. I think the should have worked together because is the pope is in charge the emper will have a fit, and if the emperor is leader the pope will have a fit.
I never thought of it like that. But wouldn't people go crazy? I no I would
I think they should have collaborated together. I think this because the emperor can't rule everything. Like ALex said people will abuse it.
I think thae King beacuse he has all the power
i dissagee Javia because what if he gets mad. He is going to kick or kill someone because they dissagree with him. So i think that the pope should be in charge
I agree with you Matthew because he might get mad if some one dose not agree with him that person will be killed and I don't think that is right. But the pope will understand and consider the offer and will not kill or kick him out of the church.
I think the the pope should be in control.One reason is that he probrialy knows about religious things.Also if he gets mad he cant kill or kick someone out
i agree with you matt because i said almost the same thing. good job that is a realy good reason.
I think the pope should have ruled the church because they are seen as the ruler of the church. Well not exactly the ruler but they do have a higher power than priests.In all honesty, it really shouldn't have one sole ruler since its all about god, but you still need some order in life :///
I totally agree with you. Hes not exactly the ruler. I think your right completely.
I think I don't agree with you. If there was no leader of the Christian church then everyone would do what they wanted. They wouldn't go to church at the correct time or not even go at all.
I disagree with Sela V. because the pope only has control over somethings and the king has more power of things so why not have control over everything......
I think the pope should be the leader because everyone needs a job and the popes job is to lead the church.
I think the pope should have been in control because if the emperor was in control then he would just do what he wanted.I mean the empire could have been nice but they probably abuse there power. The pope would probably understand. He would probably make the right decisions
I agree with you because the Emperor might do whatever he want . Also agree because the Pope might be a little more nicer to the people. Also I agree because the Pope my understand people and be a little more nicer to them. Those are all the reasons why I agree with you.
I think the pope should have been in control. Because the Pope might know more things about religious then the Emperor. Also the Pope will be more nicer and share. Also the Emperor would might kill someone if they don't listen to him and he can make lie about Christianity. The Pope might be more nicer. Those are all the reasons why I think the Pope should be in control of the Christian Church.
I agree because the emperor might get abusive with his power. The emperor might not know as much about religion as the Pope.
I agree with you because the pope is probably nicer then the Emperor.
plus the Emperor would probably steal from the church.
I agree with you Bryan because if the pope would know because he sort of spent most of his life learning about religions
The Emperor will just want all the power and the Pope does not care about power, and the Emperor will not care about the peoples problems but the Pope will. The Pope will try his or her best to fix peoples problem and the Emperor will not help . Also, if the Pope was in charge he will help people learn about their religion.
I agree with you Lena.The emperor would not care about people like the pope would.
I think the pope definitely should have had control of the Christian Church. The Pope really cares about the church. Why would they give the power to an emperor who just cared about getting more power? The Pope probably knows more about the religion anyways. I know I would want a leader who knew what they were talking about.
I think the pope should be in charge of the Church because they are not in charge of a lot of things when the Emperor is in charge of every thing + Emperors don't really care about what there people think the care what they think when the Pope lessens what they people of the church care about. And that's what how I think should be in charge of the christen church.
I agree with you Kailey because the pope has nothing else to do. They will also care more about the people in the church and the religion practiced. The emperor also has other things to do and won't care as much about the people
I agree with you kailey because if the emperor was in charge he would really care on the other hand the pope would listen to the people and fix the church
I think the Pope should be in charge. If the emperor is in charge, he might not listen to the Christians and what they want. The Pope may know more about the religion than the emperor does.
I think the pope should of been the leader of the church. I think that because the emperor has other things to do like run the city and deal with problems. While the pope has nothing else to do and has time to run the church. A lot of times the pope is more dedicated to that religion, so they might know more about it.
Yes, I totally agree with you Matthew. The emperor wouldn't have the time to run the church when he has to run the empire.
I think the pope should be in charge. He should be in charge because I think the emperor will just do whatever he wants to do. On the other hand the pope would do what is right for the Christian church.
I think the Pope should have ruled because he is higher than anyone in the Christian church. He would have better experience ruling the Christian church, the emperor would not have the experience to control the church.
I think that the Pope should be in charge of the Christian church.The Pope would be someone that is religious and the emperor might not be religious.Another reason is that the emperor will do anything he wants to do and might not listen to what the Christian have to say.
I think the king should have control of the church because he is the king so he should have control of everything btw do not read that other comment I made because I was in a rush.
I think that the pope should be in control of the church. I think this because the pope cares about the church. The Emperor cares about his popularity and would have too much control. So that's way I think the pope should be in control of the church.
Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.